4.7 Article

First-principles investigations of equilibrium calcium isotope fractionation between clinopyroxene and Ca-doped orthopyroxene

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages 132-142

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.06.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Key Development Program of Basic Research of China [2014CB845905]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41173031, 41274087, 41090370]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  4. 111 project
  5. NSF [EAR-1144727]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1144727] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Equilibrium fractionation factors of Ca isotopes among mantle minerals are essential for using Ca isotopes as an important tracer in mantle geochemistry. Using the vibrational frequencies obtained by the first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT), we calculated equilibrium fractionation factors of Ca isotopes between two major Ca-bearing minerals, clinopyroxene (cpx) and orthopyroxene (opx). Our results show that opx has much higher Ca-44/Ca-40 than its co-existing cpx even at high temperatures (e.g., 1273 K), agreeing with the observations on mantle peridotites. In addition to the well-known temperature effect, our calculations for the first time reveal that the inter-mineral Ca isotope fractionation factor between opx and cpx also has a strong dependence on the chemical composition of opx (i.e., Ca content). Specifically, it increases substantially with decreasing Ca/Mg (atomic ratio) of opx when Ca/Mg-opx is lower than 1/15. Such compositional effect on inter-mineral Ca isotope fractionation provides a convincing interpretation to the different isotope fractionations between coexisting opx and cpx observed in Kilbourne Hole and San Carlos peridotites. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available