4.7 Article

A general model for predicting the solubility behavior of H2O-CO2 fluids in silicate melts over a wide range of pressure, temperature and compositions

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 582-609

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [90914010, 91014007, 40973012, 41020134003]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a general thermodynamically-based model is presented for the solubility of H2O-CO2 in silicate melts over a wide range of temperatures (from 933 K to 2003 K), pressures (up to 30 kbar) and melt compositions (from ultramafic to silicic, from metaluminous to peraluminous, and from subalkaline to peralkaline). Using an equation of state for the fluid phase that differs from previous models and deriving activity coefficients of species in silicate melts based on a specific interaction theory, this model can not only reproduce the data used for calibrations, but also predict the solubility well beyond the data range. The accuracies of solubilities predicted from this model are shown to be 7.2% for H2O and 9.7% for CO2, respectively, which are well within the experimental uncertainty. In addition, this model can be applied to the determination of equilibrium saturation pressure at which silicate melts are saturated with a fluid phase, modeling the evolution of ascending magmas through degassing processes, and elucidating the fluid-melt partitioning behavior of CO2 and H2O. An online version of this model is available at the website: http://calc.geochem-model.org/Test/Services/WebForm1.aspx and the program can be downloaded at: www.geochem-model.org/archives/programs.htm. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available