4.7 Article

Relationship between iron-meteorite composition and size: Compositional distribution of irons from North Africa

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 75, Issue 7, Pages 1757-1772

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.12.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NNG06GG35G, NNX10AG98G]
  2. NASA [133014, NNX10AG98G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the past three decades many iron meteorites have been collected from the deserts of North Africa. Almost all are now characterized, and the distribution among classes is found to be very different from those that were in museums prior to the collection of meteorites from hot and cold (Antarctica) deserts. Similar to the iron meteorites from Antarctica, the irons from Northwest Africa include a high fraction of ungrouped irons and of minor subgroups of group IAB. The different distribution is attributed to the small median size of the desert meteorites (similar to 1.3 kg in North African irons, similar to 30 kg in non-desert irons), It appears that a sizable fraction of these small (several centimeter) masses constitute melt pockets produced by impacts in chondritic regoliths; they were never part of a large (meter-to-kilometer) magma bodies. As a result, a meter-size fragment ejected from the regolith of the asteroid may contain several of these small metallic masses. It may be that such stochastic sampling effects enhanced the fraction of IAB-sHL irons among the irons from Northwest Africa. The variety observed in small meteoroids is also enhanced because (relative to large) small fragments are more efficiently ejected from asteroids and because the orbital parameters of small meteoroids are more strongly affected by collisions and drag effects, they evolve to have Earth-crossing perihelia more rapidly than large meteoroids; as a result, the set of small meteoroids tends to sample a larger number of parent asteroids than does the set of larger meteoroids. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available