4.7 Article

Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of marine dissolved organic matter isolated using coupled reverse osmosis-electrodialysis

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 73, Issue 14, Pages 4215-4231

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [0425624, 0425603]
  2. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0425603, 0425624] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coupled reverse osmosis-electrodialysis (RO/ED) method was used to isolate dissolved organic matter (DOM) from 16 seawater samples. The average yield of organic carbon was 75 +/- 12%, which is consistently greater than the yields of organic carbon that have been commonly achieved using XAD resins, C-18 adsorbents, and cross-flow ultrafiltration. UV-visible absorbance spectra and molar C/N ratios of isolated samples were consistent with the corresponding properties of DOM in the original seawater samples, indicating that DOM samples can be isolated using the coupled RO/ED method without any bias for/against these two properties. Five of the samples were desalted sufficiently that reliable measurements of their C-13 and H-1 NMR spectra and their Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) mass spectra could be obtained. The C-13 and H-1 NMR spectra of RO/ED samples differed distinctly from those of samples that have been isolated in much lower yields by other methods. In particular, RO/ED samples contained a relatively lower proportion of carbohydrate carbon and a relatively greater proportion of alkyl carbon than samples that have been isolated using cross-flow ultrafiltration. From the FTICR mass spectra of RO/ED samples, samples from the open ocean contained a much lower proportion of unsaturated compounds and a much higher proportion of fatty acids than coastal samples. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available