4.1 Article

Identifying organic matter provenance in sediments using isotopic ratios in an urban river

Journal

GEOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 181-187

Publisher

GEOCHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2343/geochemj.1.0059

Keywords

riverine sediment; isotopic ratios; effluent; C3 plants; sources

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40721002]
  2. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To provide a better understanding of potential hazard of effluent detritus, both at the present and in the future, the dispersal and accumulation of sewage-derived materials in the receiving river should be addressed. For the goals, we determined concentrations and isotopic compositions of sedimentary organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (SON) and those of effluents in an urban river (Nanming River, China). In the river, the two major sources of sedimentary organic matter (SOM) are effluent detritus (delta C-13: 25.0 parts per thousand: delta N-15: +8.5 parts per thousand; C/N: 8.1) and C3 plants growing along the river bank (delta C-13: -27.7 parts per thousand; delta N-15: -0.9 parts per thousand; C/N: >28). Isotopic difference between the two end-members was observed to be 9.4 parts per thousand for nitrogen, compared with 2.7 parts per thousand for carbon, and hence nitrogen isotopic difference between end-members is large enough to be used as a tracer for source recognition of SOM. Using a mixing model, we found that at outfalls sewage-derived SON accounted for >60% of the bulk SON. At site 40 km far from outfall, fraction of sewage-derived SON was still high to 50%. But at most sites, though about 450,000 m(3) sewage effluents per day discharge into the river, effluent detritus and C3 plants contributed nearly the same to SOM, indicated that natural contribution from C3 plants should be also paid attention to.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available