4.7 Article

The enduring utility of continuous culturing in experimental evolution

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages 399-405

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.09.015

Keywords

Experimental evolution; Continuous culture; Chemostat; Turbidostat; Microbial evolution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1120425, MCB-1244219]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the National Institutes of Health [R01 GM094306, P41 GM103533]
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM107466]
  4. Dupont Young Professor award
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1120425] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR011823] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM094306, R01GM101091, R01GM107466, P41GM103533] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studying evolution in the laboratory provides a means of understanding the processes, dynamics and outcomes of adaptive evolution in precisely controlled and readily replicated conditions. The advantages of experimental evolution are maximized when the selection is well defined, which enables linking genotype, phenotype and fitness. One means of maintaining a defined selection is continuous culturing: chemostats enable the study of adaptive evolution in constant nutrient-limited environments, whereas cells in turbidostats evolve in constant nutrient abundance. Although the experimental effort required for continuous culturing is considerable relative to the experimental simplicity of serial batch culture, the opposite is true of the environments they produce: continuous culturing results in simplified and invariant conditions whereas serially diluted batch cultures are complex and dynamic. The comparative simplicity of the selective environment that is unique to continuous culturing provides an ideal experimental system for addressing key questions in adaptive evolution. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available