4.7 Article

Noncanonical secondary structures arising from non-B DNA motifs are determinants of mutagenesis

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1264-1271

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.231688.117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. International Cancer Genome Consortium
  2. Breast Cancer Somatic Genetics Study (BASIS), a research project - European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2010-2014) [242006]
  3. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute core grant
  4. Wellcome Trust Intermediate Clinical Research grant [WT100183MA]
  5. CRUK Advanced Clinician Scientist Award [C60100/A23916]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Somatic mutations show variation in density across cancer genomes. Previous studies have shown that chromatin organization and replication time domains are correlated with, and thus predictive of, this variation. Here, we analyze 1809 whole-genome sequences from 10 cancer types to show that a subset of repetitive DNA sequences, called non-B motifs that predict noncanonical secondary structure formation can independently account for variation in mutation density. Combined with epigenetic factors and replication timing, the variance explained can be improved to 43%-76%. Approximately twofold mutation enrichment is observed directly within non-B motifs, is focused on exposed structural components, and is dependent on physical properties that are optimal for secondary structure formation. Therefore, there is mounting evidence that secondary structures arising from non-B motifs are not simply associated with increased mutation density-they are possibly causally implicated. Our results suggest that they are determinants of mutagenesis and increase the likelihood of recurrent mutations in the genome. This analysis calls for caution in the interpretation of recurrent mutations and highlights the importance of taking non-B motifs that can simply be inferred from the reference sequence into consideration in background models of mutability henceforth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available