4.7 Article

Restless Legs Syndrome-associated intronic common variant in Meis1 alters enhancer function in the developing telencephalon

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 592-603

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.166751.113

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung, Cologne, Germany [10.09.2.146, 10.12.2.183]
  2. KKF-TUM [8766156]
  3. DAAD [0811963]
  4. COST
  5. DFG [WI 1820/4-1, WI 1820/5-1]
  6. Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen
  7. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  8. State of Bavaria
  9. Munich Center of Health Sciences (MC Health)
  10. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, LMUinnovativ
  11. Spanish Government
  12. Andalusian Government
  13. Feder program [BFU2010-14839, BFU2009-07044, CSD2007-00008]
  14. Proyectos de Excelencia [CVI-3488, CVI 2658]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified the MEIS1 locus for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), but causal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and their functional relevance remain unknown. This locus contains a large number of highly conserved noncoding regions (HCNRs) potentially functioning as cis-regulatory modules. We analyzed these HCNRs for allele-dependent enhancer activity in zebrafish and mice and found that the risk allele of the lead SNP rs12469063 reduces enhancer activity in the Meis1 expression domain of the murine embryonic ganglionic eminences (GE). CREB1 binds this enhancer and rs12469063 affects its binding in vitro. In addition, MEIS1 target genes suggest a role in the specification of neuronal progenitors in the GE, and heterozygous Meis1-deficient mice exhibit hyperactivity, resembling the RLS phenotype. Thus, in vivo and in vitro analysis of a common SNP with small effect size showed allele-dependent function in the prospective basal ganglia representing the first neurodevelopmental region implicated in RLS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available