4.7 Article

Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1522-1540

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.156539.113

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
  4. NIH [5U01ES017154, P01CA095616, P01CA142536]
  5. Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Research Award from the March of Dimes Foundation [5-FY10-491]
  6. Edward Jr. Mallinckrodt Foundation [P50CA134254, R01HG007354]
  7. Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital
  8. Dermatology Foundation
  9. NIDA's R25 program [DA027995]
  10. Sontag Foundation
  11. Program for the National Science Foundation of China [11271064]
  12. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-09-0248]
  13. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  14. Fund of Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department [20111804]
  15. [NSF-DMS0906023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework MUM (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of MUM compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available