4.7 Article

p53 binds preferentially to genomic regions with high DNA-encoded nucleosome occupancy

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1361-1368

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.103945.109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI [R37 CA40099]
  2. Yad Abraham Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy
  3. NCI PSOC [U54 CA143869-01]
  4. NIH [5R01CA119176-03]
  5. ERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human transcription factor TP53 is a pivotal roadblock against cancer. A key unresolved question is how the p53 protein selects its genomic binding sites in vivo out of a large pool of potential consensus sites. We hypothesized that chromatin may play a significant role in this site-selection process. To test this, we used a custom DNA microarray to measure p53 binding at approximately 2000 sites predicted to possess high-sequence specificity, and identified both strongly bound and weakly bound sites. When placed within a plasmid, weakly bound sites become p53 responsive and regain p53 binding when stably integrated into random genomic locations. Notably, strongly bound sites reside preferentially within genomic regions whose DNA sequence is predicted to encode relatively high intrinsic nucleosome occupancy. Using in vivo nucleosome occupancy measurements under conditions where p53 is inactive, we experimentally confirmed this prediction. Furthermore, upon p53 activation, nucleosomes are partially displaced from a relatively broad region surrounding the bound p53 sites, and this displacement is rapidly reversed upon inactivation of p53. Thus, in contrast to the general assumption that transcription-factor binding is preferred in sites that have low nucleosome occupancy prior to factor activation, we find that p53 binding occurs preferentially within a chromatin context of high intrinsic nucleosome occupancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available