4.7 Article

High-resolution mapping and analysis of copy number variations in the human genome: A data resource for clinical and research applications

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1682-1690

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.083501.108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [GM081519]
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Health [SAP 4100037707]
  3. Cotswold Foundation
  4. David Lawrence Altschuler Chair in Genomics and Computational Biology
  5. Institutional Awards to the Center for Applied Genomics
  6. Center for Biomedical Informatics
  7. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM081519] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a database of copy number variations (CNVs) detected in 2026 disease-free individuals, using high-density, SNP-based oligonucleotide microarrays. This large cohort, comprised mainly of Caucasians (65.2%) and African-Americans (34.2%), was analyzed for CNVs in a single study using a uniform array platform and computational process. We have catalogued and characterized 54,462 individual CNVs, 77.8% of which were identified in multiple unrelated individuals. These nonunique CNVs mapped to 3272 distinct regions of genomic variation spanning 5.9% of the genome; 51.5% of these were previously unreported, and >85% are rare. Our annotation and analysis confirmed and extended previously reported correlations between CNVs and several genomic features such as repetitive DNA elements, segmental duplications, and genes. We demonstrate the utility of this data set in distinguishing CNVs with pathologic significance from normal variants. Together, this analysis and annotation provides a useful resource to assist with the assessment of CNVs in the contexts of human variation, disease susceptibility, and clinical molecular diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available