4.7 Article

BayesCall: A model-based base-calling algorithm for high-throughput short-read sequencing

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1884-1895

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.095299.109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-HG002942, R00-GM080099]
  2. NSF CAREER [DBI-0846015]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  4. Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0846015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracting sequence information from raw images of fluorescence is the foundation underlying several high-throughput sequencing platforms. Some of the main challenges associated with this technology include reducing the error rate, assigning accurate base-specific quality scores, and reducing the cost of sequencing by increasing the throughput per run. To demonstrate how computational advancement can help to meet these challenges, a novel model-based base-calling algorithm, BayesCall, is introduced for the Illumina sequencing platform. Being founded on the tools of statistical learning, BayesCall is flexible enough to incorporate various features of the sequencing process. In particular, it can easily incorporate time-dependent parameters and model residual effects. This new approach significantly improves the accuracy over Illumina's base-caller Bustard, particularly in the later cycles of a sequencing run. For 76-cycle data on a standard viral sample, phiX174, BayesCall improves Bustard's average per-base error rate by similar to 51%. The probability of observing each base can be readily computed in BayesCall, and this probability can be transformed into a useful base-specific quality score with a high discrimination ability. A detailed study of BayesCall's performance is presented here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available