4.7 Article

Whole population, genome-wide mapping of hidden relatedness

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 318-326

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.081398.108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [5 U54 CA121852]
  2. NSF [NOA CCF-0829882]
  3. NIH/NIDDK [5R01 DK60089]
  4. Massachusetts Biomedical Research Corporation Tosteson Postdoctoral Fellowship
  5. Starr Foundation
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  8. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [845677] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present GERMLINE, a robust algorithm for identifying segmental sharing indicative of recent common ancestry between pairs of individuals. Unlike methods with comparable objectives, GERMLINE scales linearly with the number of samples, enabling analysis of whole-genome data in large cohorts. Our approach is based on a dictionary of haplotypes that is used to efficiently discover short exact matches between individuals. We then expand these matches using dynamic programming to identify long, nearly identical segmental sharing that is indicative of relatedness. We use GERMLINE to comprehensively survey hidden relatedness both in the HapMap as well as in a densely typed island population of 3000 individuals. We verify that GERMLINE is in concordance with other methods when they can process the data, and also facilitates analysis of larger scale studies. We bolster these results by demonstrating novel applications of precise analysis of hidden relatedness for (1) identification and resolution of phasing errors and (2) exposing polymorphic deletions that are otherwise challenging to detect. This finding is supported by concordance of detected deletions with other evidence from independent databases and statistical analyses of fluorescence intensity not used by GERMLINE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available