4.5 Article

Reduced Efficacy of Natural Selection on Codon Usage Bias in Selfing Arabidopsis and Capsella Species

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages 868-880

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evr085

Keywords

Arabidopsis; Capsella; natural selection; inbreeding; codon usage bias

Funding

  1. e-Science Data, Information and Knowledge Transformation (eDIKT) initiative
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30730008, 40976081]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB815701]
  4. National S&T Major Project of China [2009ZX08010-017B]
  5. Chang Hung-Ta Science Foundation of Sun Yat-Sen University
  6. Royal Society of Edinburgh
  7. Caledonian Research Foundation
  8. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  9. Government of Ontario
  10. BBSRC [BB/E024718/1, BB/E020909/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E020909/1, BB/E024718/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Population genetic theory predicts that the efficacy of natural selection in a self-fertilizing species should be lower than its outcrossing relatives because of the reduction in the effective population size (N-e) in the former brought about by inbreeding. However, previous analyses comparing Arabidopsis thaliana (selfer) with A. lyrata (outcrosser) have not found conclusive support for this prediction. In this study, we addressed this issue by examining silent site polymorphisms (synonymous and intronic), which are expected to be informative about changes in N-e. Two comparisons were made: A. thaliana versus A. lyrata and Capsella rubella (selfer) versus C. grandiflora (outcrosser). Extensive polymorphism data sets were obtained by compiling published data from the literature and by sequencing 354 exon loci in C. rubella and 89 additional loci in C. grandiflora. To extract information from the data effectively for studying these questions, we extended two recently developed models in order to investigate detailed selective differences between synonymous codons, mutational biases, and biased gene conversion (BGC), taking into account the effects of recent changes in population size. We found evidence that selection on synonymous codons is significantly weaker in the selfers compared with the outcrossers and that this difference cannot be fully accounted for by mutational biases or BGC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available