4.5 Article

Retrogenes in Rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp japonica) Exhibit Correlated Expression with Their Source Genes

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages 1357-1368

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evr111

Keywords

retroposition; gene expression; gene duplication

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [20710149]
  2. Genomics for Agricultural Innovation from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) of Japan [RTR0001]
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-0723860]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20710149] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene duplication occurs by either DNA- or RNA-based processes; the latter duplicates single genes via retroposition of messenger RNA. The expression of a retroposed gene copy (retrocopy) is expected to be uncorrelated with its source gene because upstream promoter regions are usually not part of the retroposition process. In contrast, DNA-based duplication often encompasses both the coding and the intergenic (promoter) regions; hence, expression is often correlated, at least initially, between DNA-based duplicates. In this study, we identified 150 retrocopies in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp japonica), most of which represent ancient retroposition events. We measured their expression from high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data generated from seven tissues. At least 66% of the retrocopies were expressed but at lower levels than their source genes. However, the tissue specificity of retrogenes was similar to their source genes, and expression between retrocopies and source genes was correlated across tissues. The level of correlation was similar between RNA-and DNA-based duplicates, and they decreased over time at statistically indistinguishable rates. We extended these observations to previously identified retrocopies in Arabidopsis thaliana, suggesting they may be general features of the process of retention of plant retrogenes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available