4.6 Article

Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 547-552

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.190

Keywords

ethics; Informed Cohort Oversight Board; participant preferences; pediatrics; return of individual genomic research results

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute/National Institutes of Health [1RC1HG005491, 1-R01HG006615, HG006500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Approaches to return individual results to participants in genomic research variably focus on actionability, duty to share, or participants' preferences. Our group at Boston Children's Hospital has prioritized participants' preferences by implementing the Gene Partnership, a genomic research repository, based on the Informed Cohort model that offers return of results in accordance with participant preferences. Recognizing that ethical oversight is essential, the Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board was convened in 2009. Methods: Over 3 years, the Informed Cohort Oversight Board developed guidelines for the return of individual genomic research results. Results: The Informed Cohort Oversight Board defined its guiding principles as follows: to respect the developing autonomy of pediatric participants and parental decision-making authority by returning results consistent with participants' preferences and to protect participants from harm. Potential harms and strategies to eliminate harm were identified. Guidelines were developed for participant preferences that consider the child's development and family dynamics. The Informed Cohort Oversight Board agreed that to prevent harm, including harms related to interfering with a child's future autonomy, there will be results that should not be returned regardless of participant preferences. Conclusion: The Informed Cohort Oversight Board developed guidelines for the return of results that respect the preferences of parents, children, and adult participants while seeking to protect against harm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available