4.6 Article

DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 296-305

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.73

Keywords

clinical validation; detection rate; false-positive rate; fetal DNA; massively parallel shotgun sequencing; prenatal screening; trisomy 18; trisomy 13

Funding

  1. Sequenom Clinical Advisory Board
  2. Sequenom, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine whether maternal plasma cell free DNA sequencing can effectively identify trisomy 18 and 13. Methods: Sixty-two pregnancies with trisomy 18 and 12 with trisomy 13 were selected from a cohort of 4,664 pregnancies along with matched euploid controls (including 212 additional Down syndrome and matched controls already reported), and their samples tested using a laboratory-developed, next-generation sequencing test. Interpretation of the results for chromosome 18 and 13 included adjustment for CG content bias. Results: Among the 99.1% of samples interpreted (1,971/1,988), observed trisomy 18 and 13 detection rates were 100% (59/59) and 91.7% (11/12) at false-positive rates of 0.28% and 0.97%, respectively. Among the 17 samples without an interpretation, three were trisomy 18. If z-score cutoff's for trisomy 18 and 13 were raised slightly, the overall false-positive rates for the three aneuploidies could be as low as 0.1% (2/1,688) at an overall detection rate of 98.9% (280/283) for common aneuploidies. An independent academic laboratory confirmed performance in a subset. Conclusion: Among high-risk pregnancies, sequencing circulating cell free DNA detects nearly all cases of Down syndrome, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13, at a low false-positive rate. This can potentially reduce invasive diagnostic procedures and related fetal losses by 95%. Evidence supports clinical testing for these aneuploidies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available