4.6 Article

Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: Black and Hispanic women particularly at risk

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 349-355

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182091ba4

Keywords

breast cancer; BRCA1/2; race; ethnicity

Funding

  1. Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center as part of National Institutes of Health [P30 CA06516-43]
  2. NCI [R25 CA92203-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Women with early-onset (age <= 40 years) breast cancer are at high risk of carrying deleterious mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes; genetic assessment is thus recommended. Knowledge of BRCA1/2 mutation status is useful in guiding treatment decisions. To date, there has been no national study of BRCA1/2 testing among newly diagnosed women. Methods: We used administrative data (2004-2007) from a national sample of 14.4 million commercially insured patients to identify newly diagnosed, early-onset breast cancer cases among women aged 20-40 years (n = 1474). Cox models assessed BRCA1/2 testing, adjusting for covariates and differential lengths of follow-up. Results: Overall, 30% of women aged 40 years or younger received BRCA1/2 testing. In adjusted analyses, women of Jewish ethnicity were significantly more likely to be tested (hazard ratio = 2.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-5.28), whereas black women (hazard ratio = 0.34, 95% 0.18-0.64) and Hispanic women (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.81) were significantly less likely to be tested than non-Jewish white women. Those enrolled in a health maintenance organization (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.99) were significantly less likely to receive BRCA1/2 testing than those point of service insurance plans. Testing rates increased sharply for women diagnosed in 2007 compared with 2004. Conclusions: In this national sample of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer at high risk for BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic assessment was low, with marked racial differences in testing. Genet Med 2011:13(4):349-355.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available