4.6 Article

Lysosomal storage diseases: Diagnostic confirmation and management of presymptomatic individuals

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 457-484

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318211a7e1

Keywords

newborn screening; lysosomal storage disease; enzyme replacement therapy; presymptomatic; consensus guidelines

Funding

  1. ACMG Foundation
  2. BioMarin Pharmaceuticals
  3. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  4. Genzyme Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To develop educational guidelines for the diagnostic confirmation and management of individuals identified by newborn screening, family-based testing after proband identification, or carrier testing in at-risk populations, and subsequent prenatal or postnatal testing of those who are presymptomatic for a lysosomal storage disease. Methods: Review of English language literature and discussions in a consensus development panel comprised an international group of experts in the clinical and laboratory diagnosis, treatment and management, newborn screening, and genetic aspects of lysosomal storage diseases. Results: Although clinical trial and longitudinal data were used when available, the evidence in the literature is limited and consequently the recommendations must be considered as expert opinion. Guidelines were developed for Fabry, Gaucher, and Niemann-Pick A/B diseases, glycogen storage type II (Pompe disease), globoid cell leukodystrophy (Krabbe disease), metachromatic leukodystrophy, and mucopolysaccharidoses types I, II, and VI. Conclusion: These guidelines serve as an educational resource for confirmatory testing and subsequent clinical management of presymptomatic indivduals suspected to have a lysosomal storage disease; they also help to define a research agenda for longitudinal studies such as the American College of Medical Genetics/National Institutes of Health Newborn Screening Translational Research Network. Genet Med 2011: 13(5): 457-484.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available