4.2 Article

Expression levels of candidate genes for intramuscular fat deposition in two Banna mini-pig inbred lines divergently selected for fatness traits

Journal

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 783-789

Publisher

SOC BRASIL GENETICA
DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572012005000079

Keywords

intramuscular fat (IMF); expression levels; Banna mini-pig inbred line (BMIL)

Funding

  1. National Key Program of Transgenic Project of China [2009ZX08009-140B]
  2. National Key Foundation Research Development Project of China (973 Project) [2007CB116201]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30660132, 31060331]
  4. Yunnan Natural Science Foundation of China [2009CD056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intramuscular fat (IMF) content plays an important role in meat quality. Many genes involved in lipid and energy metabolism were identified as candidate genes for IMF deposition, since genetic polymorphisms within these genes were associated with IMF content. However, there is less information on the expression levels of these genes in the muscle tissue. This study aimed at investigating the expression levels of sterol regulating element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT-1), heart-fatty acids binding protein (H-FABP), leptin receptor (LEPR) and melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) genes and proteins in two divergent Banna mini-pig inbred lines (BMIL). A similar growth performance was found in both the fat and the lean BMIL. The fat meat and IMF content in the fat BMIL were significantly higher than in the lean BMIL, but the lean meat content was lower. The serum triacylglycerol (TAG) and free fatty acid (FFA) contents were significantly higher in the fat than in the lean BMIL. The expression levels of SREBP-1c, DGAT-1 and H-FABP genes and proteins in fat BMIL were increased compared to the lean BMIL. However, the expression levels of LEPR and MC4R genes and proteins were lower.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available