4.4 Article

Rapid Identification of Major-Effect Genes Using the Collaborative Cross

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 198, Issue 1, Pages 75-+

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.163014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP110102067]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1037321, 1069173]
  3. Diabetes Research Foundation of Western Australia
  4. Sunsuper Ride to Conquer Cancer
  5. Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research
  6. National Institutes of Health [P50 GM076468, R01 GM070683]
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1069173] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Collaborative Cross (CC) was designed to facilitate rapid gene mapping and consists of hundreds of recombinant inbred lines descended from eight diverse inbred founder strains. A decade in production, it can now be applied to mapping projects. Here, we provide a proof of principle for rapid identification of major-effect genes using the CC. To do so, we chose coat color traits since the location and identity of many relevant genes are known. We ascertained in 110 CC lines six different coat phenotypes: albino, agouti, black, cinnamon, and chocolate coat colors and the white-belly trait. We developed a pipeline employing modifications of existing mapping tools suitable for analyzing the complex genetic architecture of the CC. Together with analysis of the founders' genome sequences, mapping was successfully achieved with sufficient resolution to identify the causative genes for five traits. Anticipating the application of the CC to complex traits, we also developed strategies to detect interacting genes, testing joint effects of three loci. Our results illustrate the power of the CC and provide confidence that this resource can be applied to complex traits for detection of both qualitative and quantitative trait loci.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available