4.4 Article

Multiple Quantitative Trait Analysis Using Bayesian Networks

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 198, Issue 1, Pages 129-137

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.165704

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Technology Strategy Board (TSB)
  2. Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [TS/I002170/1]
  3. BBSRC Crop Science Initiative project [BB/E007201/1]
  4. NIAB Trust
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M000869/1, BB/E007201/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [TS/I002170/1, TS/I001263/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/M000869/1, BB/E007201/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. EPSRC [TS/I002170/1, TS/I001263/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Models for genome-wide prediction and association studies usually target a single phenotypic trait. However, in animal and plant genetics it is common to record information on multiple phenotypes for each individual that will be genotyped. Modeling traits individually disregards the fact that they are most likely associated due to pleiotropy and shared biological basis, thus providing only a partial, confounded view of genetic effects and phenotypic interactions. In this article we use data from a Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC) winter wheat population to explore Bayesian networks as a convenient and interpretable framework for the simultaneous modeling of multiple quantitative traits. We show that they are equivalent to multivariate genetic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and that they are competitive with single-trait elastic net and single-trait GBLUP in predictive performance. Finally, we discuss their relationship with other additive-effects models and their advantages in inference and interpretation. MAGIC populations provide an ideal setting for this kind of investigation because the very low population structure and large sample size result in predictive models with good power and limited confounding due to relatedness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available