4.4 Article

Quantifying Population Genetic Differentiation from Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 195, Issue 3, Pages 979-+

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.154740

Keywords

next-generation sequencing; F-ST; principal components analysis

Funding

  1. EMBO Long-Term Post-doctoral Fellowship [ALTF 229-2011]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Genomics Training Grant [T32HG000047-13]
  3. National Science Foundation [DBI-0906065]
  4. NIH [3R01HG03229-08S2, 3R01HG03229-07]
  5. Villum Fonden [00007171] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past few years, new high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies have dramatically increased speed and reduced sequencing costs. However, the use of these sequencing technologies is often challenged by errors and biases associated with the bioinformatical methods used for analyzing the data. In particular, the use of naive methods to identify polymorphic sites and infer genotypes can inflate downstream analyses. Recently, explicit modeling of genotype probability distributions has been proposed as a method for taking genotype call uncertainty into account. Based on this idea, we propose a novel method for quantifying population genetic differentiation from next-generation sequencing data. In addition, we present a strategy for investigating population structure via principal components analysis. Through extensive simulations, we compare the new method herein proposed to approaches based on genotype calling and demonstrate a marked improvement in estimation accuracy for a wide range of conditions. We apply the method to a large-scale genomic data set of domesticated and wild silkworms sequenced at low coverage. We find that we can infer the fine-scale genetic structure of the sampled individuals, suggesting that employing this new method is useful for investigating the genetic relationships of populations sampled at low coverage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available