Journal
GENETICS
Volume 190, Issue 1, Pages 175-U287Publisher
GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.133454
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- European Research Council
- National Science Foundation [IOS-1022373]
- Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
- Direct For Biological Sciences [1022373] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Measuring fitness with precision is a key issue in evolutionary biology, particularly in studying mutations of small effects. It is usually thought that sampling error and drift prevent precise measurement of very small fitness effects. We circumvented these limits by using a new combined approach to measuring and analyzing fitness. We estimated the mutational fitness effect (MFE) of three independent mini-Tn10 transposon insertion mutations by conducting competition experiments in large populations of Escherichia coli under controlled laboratory conditions. Using flow cytometry to assess genotype frequencies from very large samples alleviated the problem of sampling error, while the effect of drift was controlled by using large populations and massive replication of fitness measures. Furthermore, with a set of four competition experiments between ancestral and mutant genotypes, we were able to decompose fitness measures into four estimated parameters that account for fitness effects of our fluorescent marker (alpha), the mutation (beta), epistasis between the mutation and the marker (gamma), and departure from transitivity (tau). Our method allowed us to estimate mean selection coefficients to a precision of 2 x 10(-4). We also found small, but significant, epistatic interactions between the allelic effects of mutations and markers and confirmed that fitness effects were transitive in most cases. Unexpectedly, we also detected variation in measures of s that were significantly bigger than expected due to drift alone, indicating the existence of cryptic variation, even in fully controlled experiments. Overall our results indicate that selection coefficients are best understood as being distributed, representing a limit on the precision with which selection can be measured, even under controlled laboratory conditions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available