4.4 Article

Genomic Differentiation Between Temperate and Tropical Australian Populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 187, Issue 1, Pages 245-260

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.123059

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM071926, GM084056]
  2. Drosophila Population Genomics Project
  3. Dartmouth College
  4. Neukom Institute
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM084056, R01GM071926] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining the genetic basis of environmental adaptation is a central problem of evolutionary biology. This issue has been fruitfully addressed by examining genetic differentiation between populations that are recently separated and/or experience high rates of gene flow. A good example of this approach is the decades-long investigation of selection acting along latitudinal clines in Drosophila melanogaster. Here we use next-generation genome sequencing to reexamine the well-studied Australian D. melanogaster cline. We find evidence for extensive differentiation between temperate and tropical populations, with regulatory regions and unannotated regions showing particularly high levels of differentiation. Although the physical genomic scale of geographic differentiation is small-on the order of gene sized-we observed several larger highly differentiated regions. The region spanned by the cosmopolitan inversion polymorphism In(3R)P shows higher levels of differentiation, consistent with the major difference in allele frequencies of Standard and In(3R)P karyotypes in temperate vs. tropical Australian populations. Our analysis reveals evidence for spatially varying selection on a number of key biological processes, suggesting fundamental biological differences between flies from these two geographic regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available