4.4 Article

Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling Corrects for Population Structure in Association Mapping With Different Sample Types

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 182, Issue 3, Pages 875-888

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.098863

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES) [2006-35300-17155]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent, research has developed various promising methods to control for population structure ill genomewide association mapping of complex traits, bill systematic examination of, how well these methods perform Under different. genetic scenarios is still lacking. Appropriate methods for controlling genetic relationships among individuals need to balance the concern of false positives and statistical Power, which call vary for different association sample types. We used a series of simulated samples and empirical data sets from cross- and self-pollinated species to demonstrate the performance of several contemporary methods in correcting for different types of genetic relationships encountered ill association analysis. We proposed a two-stage dimension determination approach For both principal component. analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) to capture the major structure pattern in association mapping samples. Our results showed dial. by exploiting both genotypic and phenotypic information, this two-stage dimension determination approach balances the trade-off between data fit and model complexity, resulting in an effective reduction in false positive rate with minimum loss in statistical power. Further, the nMDS technique of correcting for genetic relationship proved to be a powerful complement to other existing methods. Our findings highlight the significance of appropriate application of different. statistical methods for dealing with complex genetic relationships in various genomewide association studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available