4.4 Article

Arabidopsis iba response5 Suppressors Separate Responses to Various Hormones

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 180, Issue 4, Pages 2019-2031

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.091512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Direct For Biological Sciences
  2. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0745122] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008362, T32-GM08362, F32-GM075689, F32 GM075689] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Auxin controls numerous plant growth processes by directing cell I division and expansion. Auxin-response mutants, including iba response5 (ibP5), exhibit a long root and decreased lateral root production in response to exogenous auxins. ibr5 also displays resistance to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). We found that the sar3 suppressor of auxin resistant1 (axy-1) mutant does not. SLIP press ibr5 auxin-response defects, suggesting that screening for ibr5 suppressors might reveal new components important for phytohormone responsiveness. We identified two classes of Arabidapsis thaliana mutants that suppressed ibr5 resistance to indole-3-butyric acid (IBA): those with restored responses to both the auxin precursor IBA and the active auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and those with restored response to IBA but not IAA. Restored IAA sensitivity was accompanied 1)), restored ABA responsiveness, whereas suppressors that remained 1AA resistant also remained ABA resistant. Some suppressors restored sensitivity to both natural and synthetic auxins; others restored responsiveness only to auxin precursors. We used positional information to determine that one ibr5 Suppressor carried a mutation in PLEIOTROPIC DRUG RESISTANCE9 (PDR9/ ABCG37/At3g53480), which encodes all ATP-binding cassette transporter previously implicated in cellular efflux of the Synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available