4.4 Article

Evolution of Primate Gene Expression: Drift and Corrective Sweeps?

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 180, Issue 3, Pages 1379-1389

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.089623

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Molecular Biology Organization
  2. Fyssen foundation
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Vienna Science and Technology Fund,
  8. Austrian Centre of Biopharmaceutical Technology
  9. Austrian Research Centers Siebersdorf
  10. Baxter AG
  11. MRC [G0501331] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [G0501331] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in gene expression play an important: role in species' evolution. Earlier studies uncovered evidence that the effect of mutations on expression levels within the primate order is skewed, with many small downregulations balanced by fewer but larger upregulations. In addition, brain-expressed genes appeared to show an increased rate of evolution on the branch leading to human. However, the lack of a mathematical model adequately describing the evolution of gene expression precluded the rigorous establishment of these observations. Here, we develop mathematical tools that allow us to revisit these earlier observations in a model-testing and inference framework. We introduce a model for skewed gene-expression evolution within a phylogenetic tree and use a separate model to account for biological or experimental outliers. A Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inference procedure allows its to infer the phylogeny and other evolutionary parameters, while quantifying the confidence in these inferences. Our results support previous observations; in particular, we find strong evidence for a sustained positive skew in the distribution of gene-expression changes in primate evolution. We propose a corrective sweep scenario to explain this phenomenon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available