4.3 Article

hTERT Cancer Risk Genotypes Are Associated With Telomere Length

Journal

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 368-372

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21630

Keywords

telomere length; hTERT; hTERC; genotypes; cancer

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Lion's Cancer Research Foundation, Umea
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. County Council of Vasterbotten
  5. Medical Faculty, Umea University
  6. Acta Oncologica through Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  7. European Community [200950]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telomere biology is associated with cancer initiation and prognosis. Collected data suggest that blood cell telomere length (TL) can change over time, which may be related to development of common disorders, such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Recently, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the region of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene were associated with various malignancies, including glioma, lung and urinary bladder cancer, and telomerase RNA gene hTERC genotypes were recently linked to TL. In the present study a hypothetical association between identified genotypes in hTERT and hTERC genes and TL were investigated. We analyzed 21 polymorphisms, covering 90% of the genetic variance, in the hTERT gene, two genetic variants in hTERC, and relative TL(RTL) at average age 50 and 60 in 959 individuals with repeated blood samples. Mean RTL at age 60 was associated with four genetic variants of the hTERT gene (rs2736100, rs2853672, rs2853677, and rs2853676), two of which reported to be associated with cancer risk. Two alleles (rs12696304, rs16847897) near the hTERC gene were confirmed as also being associated with RTL at age 60. Our data suggest that hTERT and hTERC genotypes have an impact on TL of potential relevance and detectable first at higher ages, which gives us further insight to the complex regulation of TL. Genet. Epidemiol. 36:368-372, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available