4.3 Article

Haplotype variation and genotype imputation in African populations

Journal

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 766-780

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20626

Keywords

haplotype variation; imputation; linkage disequilibrium

Funding

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM081441, R01 HG005855, R01 GM076637]
  3. Director's Pioneer Award Program [DP-1-OD-006445]
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0827436] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sub-Saharan Africa has been identified as the part of the world with the greatest human genetic diversity. This high level of diversity causes difficulties for genome-wide association (GWA) studies in African populationsfor example, by reducing the accuracy of genotype imputation in African populations compared to non-African populations. Here, we investigate haplotype variation and imputation in Africa, using 253 unrelated individuals from 15 Sub-Saharan African populations. We identify the populations that provide the greatest potential for serving as reference panels for imputing genotypes in the remaining groups. Considering reference panels comprising samples of recent African descent in Phase 3 of the HapMap Project, we identify mixtures of reference groups that produce the maximal imputation accuracy in each of the sampled populations. We find that optimal HapMap mixtures and maximal imputation accuracies identified in detailed tests of imputation procedures can instead be predicted by using simple summary statistics that measure relationships between the pattern of genetic variation in a target population and the patterns in potential reference panels. Our results provide an empirical basis for facilitating the selection of reference panels in GWA studies of diverse human populations, especially those of African ancestry. Genet. Epidemiol. 35:766780, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available