4.4 Article

A Molecular Diagnostic Approach Able to Detect the Recurrent Genetic Prognostic Factors Typical of Presenting Myeloma

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 91-98

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22222

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Novartis
  3. Schering Health Care
  4. Chugai
  5. Pharmion
  6. Celgene
  7. Ortho Biotech
  8. University of Leeds
  9. Cancer Research UK Sample Collection Grant (CTAAC)
  10. National Institutes of Health Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden Hospital
  11. Myeloma UK Programme Grant
  12. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  13. Federation Francaise de Recherche sur le myelome et les gammapathies
  14. [KA 3338/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risk stratification in myeloma requires an accurate assessment of the presence of a range of molecular abnormalities including the differing IGH translocations and the recurrent copy number abnormalities that can impact clinical behavior. Currently, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization is used to detect these abnormalities. High failure rates, slow turnaround, cost, and labor intensiveness make it difficult and expensive to use in routine clinical practice. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a molecular approach based on a multiplex polymerase chain reaction method, offers an alternative for the assessment of copy number changes present in the myeloma genome. Here, we provide evidence showing that MLPA is a powerful tool for the efficient detection of copy number abnormalities and when combined with expression assays, MLPA can detect all of the prognostically relevant molecular events which characterize presenting myeloma. This approach opens the way for a molecular diagnostic strategy that is efficient, high throughput, and cost effective. (c) 2014 The Authors. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available