4.4 Article

Exomic analysis of myxoid liposarcomas, synovial sarcomas, and osteosarcomas

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 15-24

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22114

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RC2DE020957, CA57345, CA121113, CA146799, CA133012, DK087454]
  2. Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  3. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  4. National Research Council of Sweden
  5. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  6. 973 Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB707900]
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA121113, R01CA057345, R01CA146799, P30CA006973, R37CA057345, R37CA043460, R01CA133012] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [RC2DE020957] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK087454] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007309] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are a group of histologically heterogeneous and relatively uncommon tumors. To explore their genetic origins, we sequenced the exomes of 13 osteosarcomas, eight myxoid liposarcomas (MLPS), and seven synovial sarcomas (SYN). These tumors had few genetic alterations (median of 10.8). Nevertheless, clear examples of driver gene mutations were observed, including canonical mutations in TP53, PIK3CA, SETD2, AKT1, and subclonal mutation in FBXW7. Of particular interest were mutations in H3F3A, encoding the variant histone H3.3. Mutations in this gene have only been previously observed in gliomas. Loss of heterozygosity of exomic regions was extensive in osteosarcomas but rare in SYN and MLPS. These results provide intriguing nucleotide-level information on these relatively uncommon neoplasms and highlight pathways that help explain their pathogenesis. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available