4.4 Article

Arylamine N-acetyltransferase I expression in breast cancer cell lines:: A potential marker in estrogen receptor-positive tumors

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 118-126

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prognosis for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has improved significantly with the prescription of selective ER modulators (SERMs) for ER-positive breast cancer treatment. However, only a proportion of ER-positive tumors respond to SERMs, and resistance to hormonal therapies is still a major problem. Detailed analysis of published microarray studies revealed a positive correlation between overexpression of the drug metabolizing enzyme arylamine N-acetyl-transferase type I (NATI) and ER positivity, and increasing evidence supports a biological role for NATI in breast cancer progression. We have tested a range of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cell lines for NATI enzyme activity, and monitored promoter and polyadenylation site usage. Amongst ER-positive lines, NATI activities ranged from 202 +/- 28 nmol/min/ mg cellular protein (ZR-75-1) to 1.8 +/- 0.4 nmol/min/mg cellular protein (MCF-7). The highest levels of NATI activity could not be attributed to increased NATI gene copy number; however, we did detect differences in NATI promoter and polyadenylation site usage amongst the breast tumor-derived lines. Thus, whilst all cell lines tested accumulated transcripts derived from the proximal promoter, the line expressing NATI most highly additionally initiated transcripts initiating at a more distal, tissue-specific promoter. These data pave the way for investigating NATI transcripts as candidate prognostic markers in ER-positive breast cancer. This article contains Supplementary Material available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/ipages/1045-2257/suppmat. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available