4.5 Article

Cystic fibrosis modifier genes related to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

Journal

GENES AND IMMUNITY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 370-377

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gene.2011.5

Keywords

cystic fibrosis; modifier genes; Pseudomonas; lung function

Funding

  1. Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute [2004-OGI-3-05]
  2. Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common life-shortening genetic disorders, and the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is the major causal gene. However, a substantial clinical variability among patients with identical CFTR genotypes suggests the presence of modifier genes. We tested the effect of four genes involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Analysis of a primary cohort detected eight candidate polymorphisms that were genotyped in the secondary cohort of 1579 patients; lung function and age at first infection with P. aeruginosa were considered as the phenotypes. Both additive and codominant models were considered, adjusting for confounding variables but not for multiple comparisons. In the secondary cohort, heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) rs2071749 had the most significant effect on lung function in the pediatric group (P = 0.01; P-corrected = 0.03), and complement factor 3 (C3) rs11569393 and HMOX1 rs2071746 in the adult groups (P = 0.03 for both variants; P-corrected = 0.16, 0.09). No polymorphism of complement factor B (CFB) or toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) had a significant modifying effect on lung function in either group. We have identified two genes that showed nominal association with disease severity among CF patients. However, because of the multiple comparisons made, further studies are required to confirm the interaction between these modifying genes and CFTR. Genes and Immunity (2011) 12, 370-377; doi:10.1038/gene.2011.5; published online 27 January 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available