4.5 Article

Variations in Gnai2 and Rgs1 expression affect chemokine receptor signaling and the organization of secondary lymphoid organs

Journal

GENES AND IMMUNITY
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 384-396

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gene.2010.27

Keywords

heterotrimeric G-protein; RGS protein; chemotaxis; calcium flux; spleen; marginal zone

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ligand bound chemoattractant receptors activate the heterotrimeric G-protein G(i) to stimulate downstream signaling pathways to properly position lymphocytes in lymphoid organs. Here, we show how variations in the expression of a chemokine receptor and in two components in the signaling pathway, G alpha(i2) and RGS1, affect the output fidelity of the signaling pathway. Examination of B cells from mice with varying numbers of intact alleles of Ccr7, Rgs1, Gnai2, and Gnai3 provided the basis for these results. Loss of a single allele of either Gnai2 or Rgs1 affected CCL19 triggered chemotaxis, whereas the loss of a single allele of Ccr7, which encodes the cognate CCL19 receptor, had little effect. Emphasizing the importance of Gnai2, B cells lacking Gnai3 expression responded to chemokines better than did wild-type B cells. At an organismal level, variations in Rgs1 and Gnai2 expression affected marginal zone B-cell development, splenic architecture, lymphoid follicle size, and germinal center morphology. Gnai2 expression was also needed for the proper alignment of MOMA-1(+) macrophages and MAdCAM-1(+) endothelial cells along marginal zone sinuses in the spleen. These data indicate that chemoattractant receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins, and RGS protein expression levels have a complex interrelationship that affects the responses to chemoattractant exposure. Genes and Immunity (2010) 11, 384-396; doi: 10.1038/gene.2010.27; published online 27 May 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available