4.7 Article

Polycomb function during oogenesis is required for mouse embryonic development

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 920-932

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.188094.112

Keywords

Polycomb-repressive complex 1; maternal effect; intergenerational inheritance; epigenetic memory; nuclear transfer; intra-S-phase checkpoint

Funding

  1. Novartis Research Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_125386]
  3. SystemsX.ch (Cell Plasticity)
  4. Japanese Swiss Science and Technology Cooperation Program
  5. European Network of Excellence The Epigenome,''
  6. EMBO YIP
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_125386] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammals, totipotent embryos are formed by fusion of highly differentiated gametes. Acquisition of totipotency concurs with chromatin remodeling of parental genomes, changes in the maternal transcriptome and proteome, and zygotic genome activation (ZGA). The inefficiency of reprogramming somatic nuclei in reproductive cloning suggests that intergenerational inheritance of germline chromatin contributes to developmental proficiency after natural conception. Here we show that Ring1 and Rnf2, components of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1), serve redundant transcriptional functions during oogenesis that are essential for proper ZGA, replication and cell cycle progression in early embryos, and development beyond the two-cell stage. Exchange of chromosomes between control and Ring1/Rnf2-deficient metaphase II oocytes reveal cytoplasmic and chromosome-based contributions by PRC1 to embryonic development. Our results strongly support a model in which Polycomb acts in the female germline to establish developmental competence for the following generation by silencing differentiation-inducing genes and defining appropriate chromatin states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available