4.7 Article

Senescent cells develop a PARP-1 and nuclear factor-κB-associated secretome (PNAS)

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1245-1261

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.625811

Keywords

NF-kappa B; PARP-1; secretome; senescence; CCL2; invasion

Funding

  1. INSERM
  2. Institut National du Cancer (INCA) [R08009AP]
  3. Fondation de France
  4. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [4985]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Melanoma cells can enter the process of senescence, but whether they express a secretory phenotype, as reported for other cells, is undetermined. This is of paramount importance, because this secretome can alter the tumor microenvironment and the response to chemotherapeutic drugs. More generally, the molecular events involved in formation of the senescent-associated secretome have yet to be determined. We reveal here that melanoma cells experiencing senescence in response to diverse stimuli, including anti-melanoma drugs, produce an inflammatory secretory profile, where the chemokine ligand-2 (CCL2) acts as a critical effector. Thus, we reveal how senescence induction might be involved in therapeutic failure in melanoma. We further provide a molecular relationship between senescence induction and secretome formation by revealing that the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1)/nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) signaling cascade, activated during senescence, drives the formation of a secretome endowed with protumoral and prometastatic properties. Our findings also point to the existence of the PARP-1 and NF-kappa B-associated secretome, termed the PNAS, in nonmelanoma cells. Most importantly, inhibition of PARP-1 or NF-kappa B prevents the proinvasive properties of the secretome. Collectively, identification of the PARP-1/NF-kappa B axis in secretome formation opens new avenues for therapeutic intervention against cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available