4.5 Article

A randomized controlled trial of telephone motivational interviewing to enhance mental health treatment engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 450-459

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.04.007

Keywords

War veterans; Treatment engagement; Trial; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Motivational interviewing

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Clinical Sciences Research and Development [MN078889-01]
  2. VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Research Enhancement Award Program at the San Francisco VA Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To test the efficacy of telephone-administered motivational interviewing (MI) to enhance treatment engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans with mental health (MH) problems. Method: Between April 23, 2008, and February 25, 2011, 73 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who screened positive for >= 1 MH problem(s) on telephone-administered psychometric assessment, but were not engaged in treatment, were randomized to either personalized referral for MH services and four sessions of telephone MI or standard referral and four neutral telephone check-in sessions (control) at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Blinded assessment occurred at 8 and 16 Results: In intent-to-treat analyses, 62% assigned to telephone MI engaged in MH treatment compared to 26% of controls [relative risk (RR)=2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.33-4.37, P=.004], which represented a large effect size (Cohen's h=0.74). Participants in the MI group also demonstrated significantly greater retention in MH treatment than controls [MI mean visits (S.D.)=1.68 (2.73) and control mean visits (S.D.)=0.38 (0.81), incidence rate ratio (IRR)=4.36, 95% CI=1.96-9.68, P<.001], as well as significant reductions in stigma and marijuana use at 8 weeks (P<.05). Conclusions: Telephone MI enhances MH treatment engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans with MH problems. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available