4.5 Article

Recognition of anxiety disorders by the general practitioner: results from the DASMAP Study

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 227-233

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.01.012

Keywords

Anxiety disorders; Epidemiology; General practitioner

Categories

Funding

  1. Direccio General de Planificacio i Avaluacio Sanitaria-Departament de Salut-Generalitat de Catalunya (Barcelona, Spain)
  2. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [Red RD06/0018/0017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The objectives were to determine the levels of general practitioner (GP) recognition of anxiety disorders and examine associated factors. Methods: An epidemiological survey was carried out in 77 primary care centers representative of Catalonia. A total of 3815 patients were assessed. Results: GPs identified 185 of the 666 individuals diagnosed as meeting the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis 1 Disorders (SCID-1) criteria for any anxiety disorder (sensitivity 0.28). Regarding specific anxiety disorders, panic disorder was registered in just three of the patients who, according to the SCID-I, did not meet the criteria for this condition. Generalized anxiety disorder was recorded by the GP in 46 cases, 4 of them being concordant with the SCID-I (sensitivity 0.03). The presence of comorbid hypertension was associated with an increased probability of recognition. Emotional problems as the patients' main complaint and additional appointments with a mental health specialist were associated with both adequate and erroneous recognition. Being female, having more frequent appointments with the GP and having higher levels of self-perceived stress were related to false positives. As disability increased, the probability of being erroneously detected decreased. Conclusion: GPs recognized anxiety disorders in some sufferers but still failed with respect to differentiating between anxiety disorder subtypes and disability assessment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available