4.5 Article

Screening for depression in patients with hepatitis C using the Beck Depression Inventory-II: do somatic symptoms compromise validity?

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 354-362

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.04.005

Keywords

Hepatitis C virus; Depression; Factor analysis; Liver disease; Beck Depression Inventory

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) when used to measure depression in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Method: Factor analysis was utilized to validate the BDI-II in a sample of 671 patients with HCV recruited from a large Veterans Affairs medical center. The data were split randomly: the first half was subjected to exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis was used with the second half to confirm the model. Diagnostic data were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Results: Subjects were 97.0% male, average age was 52.8 years, 16.1% had a cirrhosis diagnosis, 62.9% had a current major depressive disorder diagnosis, and 42.3% endorsed significant depressive symptoms on the BDI-II. A two-factor model was an excellent fit for the data; the factors were labeled Cognitive Affective and Somatic. Patients scored significantly higher on the Somatic factor than on the Cognitive Affective factor (P<.001), and this discrepancy increased when comparing patients based on whether they had a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Conclusions: When screening for depression in HCV patients, questions targeting cognitive and affective symptoms of depression may provide a more valid measurement of depression than questions targeting somatic symptoms of depression, particularly for patients with more advanced liver disease. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available