4.5 Article

Olfactory reference syndrome: demographic and clinical features of imagined body odor

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 398-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.04.004

Keywords

Olfactory reference syndrome; Imagined body odor; Clinical features; Delusional disorder; Taijin kyofusho

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [5K24MH063975]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Olfactory reference syndrome (ORS) - preoccupation with a false belief that one emits a foul or offensive body odor - has been described around the world for more than a century. However, only a few small studies have systematically assessed ORS's clinical features. Method: Twenty patients with ORS were systematically assessed using semistructured measures. Results: Subjects' mean age was 33.4 +/- 14.1; 60% were female. Preoccupation most often focused on the mouth (75%), armpits (60%) and genitals (35%). Bad breath (75%) and sweat (65%) were the most common odor descriptions. Currently, 85% of subjects had delusional ORS beliefs, 77% had referential thinking and 85% reported actually smelling the odor. Ninety-five percent of subjects reported performing one or more ORS-related repetitive behaviors (e.g., excessive showering). Forty percent had been housebound for at least 1 week because of ORS symptoms, 68% had a history of suicidal ideation, 32% had attempted suicide and 53% had been psychiatrically hospitalized. Forty-four percent of subjects had sought nonpsychiatric medical, surgical or dental treatment for the perceived odor, and one third had received such treatment, which was ineffective in all cases. Conclusion: ORS appears to be characterized by high morbidity and seeking of nonpsychiatric treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available