4.5 Article

AAV-encoded OTC activity persisting to adulthood following delivery to newborn spfash mice is insufficient to prevent shRNA-induced hyperammonaemia

Journal

GENE THERAPY
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 1184-1187

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2013.51

Keywords

urea cycle; hyperammonaemia; adeno-associated virus; shRNA knockdown

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1008021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urea cycle defects presenting in the neonatal period with hyperammonaemia are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and necessitate liver transplantation for long-term management. Gene therapy is therefore an attractive possibility, with vectors based on adeno-associated virus (rAAV) currently showing exciting promise in liver-targeted clinical trials in adults. Successful use of rAAV vectors in infants, however, is more challenging as episomal rAAV genomes will be lost from proliferating hepatocytes during liver growth, leaving stable transgene expression dependent on the subset of vector genomes that undergo genomic integration. To explore this challenge, we exploited the partially ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC)-deficient spf(ash) mouse model and small hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of residual endogenous OTC enzyme activity in adult mice that had received neonatal treatment with an OTC-encoding rAAV. This leaves mice reliant on vector-encoded OTC activity that has persisted from the newborn period. Despite stable transduction in approximately 8% of hepatocytes and residual vector-encoded OTC activity of up to 33% of wild-type, well above endogenous spf(ash) levels (5-7%), mice were not protected from hyperammonaemia. These data show that the distribution of OTC activity within the liver is critical and that rAAV vector re-delivery after early neonatal treatment is likely to be necessary for stable control of hyperammonaemia into adulthood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available