4.5 Article

Overexpression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein protects against noise-induced hearing loss in mice

Journal

GENE THERAPY
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 560-568

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2010.172

Keywords

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein; noise-induced hearing loss; protection; cochleae; mice; acoustic overstimulation

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP79452]
  2. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [08XD1403100]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009CB526504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apoptosis is responsible for cochlear cell death induced by noise. Here, we show that transgenic (TG) mice that overexpress X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) under control of the ubiquitin promoter display reduced hearing loss and cochlear damage induced by acoustic overstimulation (125 dB sound pressure level, 6 h) compared with wild-type (WT) littermates. Hearing status was evaluated using the auditory brainstem response (ABR), whereas cochlear damage was assessed by counts of surviving hair cells (HCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) as well as their fibers to HCs. Significantly smaller threshold shifts were found for TG mice than WT littermates. Correspondingly, the TG mice also showed a reduced loss of HCs, SGNs and their fibers to HCs. HC loss was limited to the basal end of the cochlea that detects high frequency sound. In contrast, the ABRs demonstrated a loss of hearing sensitivity across the entire frequency range tested (2-32 kHz) indicating that the hearing loss could not be fully attributed to HC loss alone. The TG mice displayed superior hearing sensitivity over this whole range, suggesting that XIAP overexpression reduces noise-induced hearing loss not only by protecting HCs but also other components of the cochlea. Gene Therapy (2011) 18, 560-568; doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.172; published online 13 January 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available