4.6 Article

Transcriptome de novo assembly sequencing and analysis of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella using the Illumina platform

Journal

GENE
Volume 537, Issue 2, Pages 285-293

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.12.041

Keywords

Red tide; Alexandrium catenella; High-throughput sequencing; Nucleosomal histones; Endocytosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41176098]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2011DZ002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, high-throughput de novo transcriptomic sequencing was performed in Alexandrium catenella, which provided the first view of the gene repertoire in this dinoflagellate based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. A total of 118,304 unigenes were identified with an average length of 673 bp (base pair). Of these unigenes, 77,936 (65.9%) were annotated with known proteins based on sequence similarities, among which 24,149 and 22,956 unigenes were assigned to gene ontology categories (GO) and clusters of orthologous groups (COGs), respectively. Furthermore, 16,467 unigenes were mapped onto 322 pathways using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Pathway database (KEGG). We also detected 1143 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), in which the tri-nucleotide repeat motif (69.3%) was the most abundant. The genetic facts and significance derived from the transcriptome dataset were suggested and discussed. All four core nucleosomal histones and linker histones were detected, in addition to the unigenes involved in histone modifications.190 unigenes were identified as being involved in the endocytosis pathway, and clathrin-dependent endocytosis was suggested to play a role in the heterotrophy of A. catenella. A conserved 22-nt spliced leader (SL) was identified in 21 unigenes which suggested the existence of trans-splicing processing of mRNA in A. catenella. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available