4.6 Article

Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and risk of myocardial infarction in an updated meta-analysis based on 34993 participants

Journal

GENE
Volume 522, Issue 2, Pages 196-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.076

Keywords

Angiotensin-converting enzyme; Myocardial infarction; Polymorphism; Etiology; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphism and risk of myocardial infarction (MI) has been extensively studied. However, the results were in controversy. This study aimed to explore the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and risk of MI by using a meta-analysis. We retrieved the following databases to indentify eligible studies: Medline, Embase, ISI, VIP, CBM and Wan Fang database. The latest update was 10th May, 2012. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to present the strength of the association. A total of 40 case-control studies with 34993 participants were included. Overall, D allele of ACE I/D polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of MI in genetic comparison models (OR (95% Cl): 1.41 (1.22-1.64) for DD vs. II; 1.11 (1.01-1.21) for ID vs. II; 1.23 (1.10-1.37) for D carriers vs. II; 1.28 (1.15-1.43) for DD vs. I carriers and 1.06 (1.02-1.10) for D carriers vs. I carriers). Subgroup analyses, according to ethnicities and countries of participants also indicated that D allele was significantly associated with an increased risk of MI in Asians (especially for Chinese) and Caucasians (especially for English, French, Germans and Italians) (OR (95% Cl) of DD vs. ID + II: 2.11 (1.65-2.70) for Asians and 1.15 (1.05-1.27) for Caucasians). In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated that D allele of ACE I/D polymorphism was a possible risk factor for MI incidence for both Asians and Caucasians. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available