4.6 Article

The HMGB1-TLR4 axis contributes to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis

Journal

GENE
Volume 527, Issue 1, Pages 389-393

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.05.041

Keywords

High mobility group box 1; Toll-like receptor 4; Apoptosis; Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170133, 81200088]
  2. Research Project Foundation of China Hubei Province Health Department [JX5B44]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and its ligand high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), are known for playing central roles in ischemia-reperfusion injury in myocardium. However, the detailed mechanisms of TLR4 and HMGB1 are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and possible mechanisms of the HMGB1-TLR4 axis and cardiomyocyte apoptosis on myocardial ischemic damage. Artificial oxygen ventilated anesthetized C3H/HeN mice and C3H/HeJ mice were subjected to 30 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by 6 h of reperfusion. The myocardial infarct size, HMGB1 levels, apoptosis index, Sax, Bcl-2 and TNF-alpha mRNA levels were assessed. The results showed that a lowered amount of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and infarct size in the myocardium of TLR4-mutant mice after myocardial I/R and that TLR4 deficiency notably inhibited the expression of HMGB1 and TNF-alpha, both of which were up-regulated by ischemia/reperfusion. These findings suggest that the HMGB1-TLR4 axis plays a pathogenic role in triggering cardiomyocyte apoptosis during myocardial I/R injury and that the possible mechanism for this process is the result of released cytokines and inflammatory response involved in the HMGB1/TLR4-related pathway. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available