4.6 Article

GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: An updated analysis

Journal

GENE
Volume 527, Issue 1, Pages 275-282

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.042

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Polymorphism; GSTP1; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many studies have investigated the association between the Glutathione S transferase-PI (GSTP1) Ile105Val polymorphism and colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility, but the results were conflicting. The aim of this study is to quantitatively summarize the relationship between this polymorphism and CRC risk. Methods: Two investigators independently searched the Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese Biomedicine databases for studies published before December 2012. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for GSTP1 polymorphism and CRC were calculated in a fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) and a random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method) when appropriate. Results: This meta-analysis included 29 case-control studies, which included 8160 CRC cases and 10,450 controls. Overall, the variant genotypes (ValVal and IleVal) of the Ile105Val were not associated with CRC risk when compared with the wild-type IleIle homozygote. Similarly, no associations were found in the dominant and recessive models. When stratifying for ethnicity, source of controls, study sample size and genotyping methods, no evidence of significant association was observed in any subgroup, except among those studies taking others as genotyping methods (recessive model, OR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.52-0.96). Limiting the analysis to the studies within Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the results were persistent and robust. No publication bias was found in the present study. Conclusion: This updated meta-analysis suggests that the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism may not be associated with CRC risk, while the observed decrease in risk of CRC may be due to small-study bias. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available