4.6 Article

The association between glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta polymorphisms and Parkinson′s disease susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Journal

GENE
Volume 524, Issue 2, Pages 133-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.045

Keywords

Polymorphisms; Meta-analysis; Parkinson's disease; Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies on the association between glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3-beta) polymorphisms (rs334558 and rs6438552) and Parkinson's disease (PD) susceptibility remained inconsistent. Thus, the goal of this study was to re-examine their exact association by a meta-analysis. All eligible studies were identified by a systematic literature search cif multiple databases. Six studies (3105 cases and 4387 controls) on rs334558 and six studies (2579 cases and 4091 controls) on rs6438552 were included. The quality of these studies was generally good according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis showed null association between the two variants and PD susceptibility in all genetic models from the overall or Caucasian population. However, the analysis of rs334558 revealed that the risk of PD decreased in heterozygote, dominant or additive models (OR = 0.60,95% CI: 0.48,0.74; OR = 0.63,95% CI: 0.51,0.78; OR = 0.82,95% Cl: 0.71,0.94, respectively) from the Eastern Asian population. Moreover, the analysis on the homozygote, heterozygote, dominant or additive models suggested that rs6438552 also reduced the PD risk (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 024,0.84; OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 039, 0.97; OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.87; OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.88, respectively) in the Eastern Asian population. Together, the findings suggest that the two variants both reduced the risk of PD in the Eastern Asian subgroup but not in the overall and Caucasian populations, which should be cautiously interpreted because of limited number of included studies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available