4.6 Article

Candesartan antagonizes pressure overload-evoked cardiac remodeling through Smad7 gene-dependent MMP-9 suppression

Journal

GENE
Volume 497, Issue 2, Pages 301-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.01.081

Keywords

Candesartan; Smad7; TGF-beta 1; MMP-9; Cardiac remodeling

Funding

  1. Nantong University [10Z088]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was designed to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism for Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) mediated cardio-protection against pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling with a focus on Smad7. ROCK-1, Smad3 and fibronectin expressions were increased in male C57BL/6 mice underwent transverse aortic constriction (TAC) for 2 weeks. Treatment with Candesartan (2 mg/kg per day) could effectively downregulate Smad3 and fibronectin accompanied by upregulating of Smad7. Further data showed that Candesartan inhibited TGF-beta 1 signal-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through attenuating matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-9), such effect was abolished by knocking-down Smad7. Moreover, TAC for 2 weeks caused increased collagen deposition, thickness of left ventricular anterior and posterior wall at end-diastole (LVAWD and LVPWD) and LVEF% reduction, which were reversed by treatment with Candesartan, but failed after knocking-down Smad7. In addition, LV dP/dt(max) and dP/dt(min), were increased by TAC for 2 weeks, and treatment with Candesartan or Nifedipine effectively depressed the high levels of dP/dt(min) induced by TAC. However, only Candesartan-mediated protective role in improving cardiac function was suppressed by tail-vein injection of Smad7 siRNA. This study uncovered a novel role for ARBs in preventing pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling via Smad7 upregulation, which suppressed MMP-9 expression and TGF-beta 1 signal-mediated EMT progress. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available