4.6 Article

Investigation on BRCA1 SNPs and its effects on mastitis in Chinese commercial cattle

Journal

GENE
Volume 505, Issue 1, Pages 190-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.010

Keywords

Cattle; BRCA1 gene; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Somatic cell count; Somatic cell score; Mastitis

Funding

  1. Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-38]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M510011]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871774, 31140006]
  4. New Variety of Transgenic Organism Great Breeding Program [2008ZX08007-002, 2009ZX08007-005B, 2009ZX08009-157B]
  5. Twelfth Five-Year Plan National Science and Technology [2011BAD28B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main objective of this study was to investigate whether the bovine breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) gene was associated with mastitis resistance in Chinese commercial cattle. A total of 51 SNPs were screened from public data resources and DNA sequencing. Three SNPs (c.5682 G>C,c.26198 C>T and c.46126 G>T) were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and created restriction site PCR (CRS-PCR) methods and 21 combinations of these SNPs were observed. The single SNP and their genetic effects on somatic cell score (SCS) were evaluated and a significant association with SCS was found in c.46126 G>T. The mean SCS of individuals with genotype KK was significantly lower than those of genotypes KL and LL. The results of combined genotypes analysis of three SNPs showed that HHLLNN genotype with the highest SCS was easily for the mastitis susceptibility, whereas GGKKMM genotype with the lowest SCS was favorable for the mastitis resistance. The information provided in the present study will be very useful for improving mastitis resistance in dairy cattle by marker-assisted selection (MAS). Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available